92
edits
Ft Wm, Inv & Tor CC talk:About: Difference between revisions
Augment LPP consultation question with example
(→LPP consultation question: new section) |
(Augment LPP consultation question with example) |
||
Line 30:
The Scottish Government is presently consulting on those forthcoming regulations. Many of the points at issue concern how Local Place Plans are to be prepared by so-called 'community bodies'. (The definition of a community body has already been laid down in law and is not part of the consultation.)
One possible view that ONLY deficiencies in the FINAL draft, including the process of producing that draft, should enable a planning authority to invalidate a Local Place Plan against the wishes of the community body that has prepared it. But a stricter view is that deficiencies in EARLIER drafts, including the process of producing those drafts, might rightly enable a planning authority to invalidate the FINAL draft of a Local Place Plan against the wishes of the community body that has prepared it.
Do you agree with the stricter view?
(A plausible example of a process deficiency might be this:- failing to actively seek the views of disabled or elderly residents at a sufficiently early stage in the preparation process to significantly influence the final plan.)
| |||